I’ve been reading History of Man, and I came across this little tidbit:
“The relatively sane are capable of accepting evidence and the insane are not.” — LRH
Scientologists – both independents and Church-going – are usually very unwilling to read criticisms of the Church, even when such criticisms come from truthful and provable evidence.
Does that mean Scientologists are insane? According to his own definition, Hubbard seems to think so!