[Marty’s] respects to Malcolm X

In today’s blog entry, Marty remembers Malcolm X, who he describes as having “had a profound effect upon me personally.”

“His autobiography chronicles obvious parallels to our struggle in his discovery that a sect leader had severely corrupted the religion he had devoted his life to defending,” says Marty.

The Independents claim that David Miscavige has altered L. Ron Hubbard’s original writings. Now, there’s no question that changes have been made. Per LRH policy, issues that have been revised must carry the date of revision. Several policies were revised after L. Ron Hubbard died in 1986. Though Scientologists believe in reincarnation, so far as I can tell, LRH has not (yet) returned from the dead. So obviously someone else made the changes.

But to say that DM’s alterations are the reason Scientology has become the evil cult that it is, well, that just ain’t true.

LRH is behind the Church’s most tyrannical abuses. Do some research and look up a punishment called overboarding. Look up the Rehabilitation Project Force. Look up disconnection. All of these have their origins in LRH policy.

To get a better feel for the Church of Scientology in the pre-DM days, read up on what the Church did to Paulette Cooper as revenge for her book The Scandal of Scientology – the famous Operation Freakout, which took place in 1976. David Miscavige was 16. He had just joined the Sea Organization. He hadn’t even started his gig as LRH’s cameraman.

David Miscavige isn’t responsible for originating those practices. Continuing them? Definitely. Making them worse? Perhaps. But originating them? Nope. That was all L. Ron Hubbard. As Scientologists would say, “LRH is the why.”

Marty obviously considers DM to be the “sect leader” who “corrupted the religion”. But the fact is that DM hasn’t significantly altered the basic teachings and practices of Scientology.

LRH set up Dianetics and Scientology to make money. I think he eventually began to believe his own bullshit – but the fact is that it’s still bullshit. We were not shoved into volcanoes and blown up by an evil galactic overlord. People do not get sick solely because they are connected to someone who treats them badly. Nor do they give up a subject of study only because they read a word they didn’t understand. Serious diseases cannot be treated by simply touching a person and saying “feel my finger.” Young children are not “little adults” that must be treated like grown-ups instead of being nurtured. And your life’s troubles are not caused by millions of invisible space spirits clinging to your body.

That’s the truth about Scientology. Toppling David Miscavige and replacing him with Marty Rathbun – or anyone else – isn’t going to change that.


2 responses to “[Marty’s] respects to Malcolm X

  1. Robert Biasotti

    Dear Caliwog,
    I appreciate your work. Your posts have always been clear, even-handed and factual.
    Your facts are invariably documented and verifiable in the public record.
    You tend to deal in facts, and allow your readers to determine “truth” for themselves.
    You generally focus on CoS’s record of human rights abuses, and avoid doctrinal and dogmatic disputes, except where doctrine and dogma clearly serve to highlight the hypocrisy of the CoS leadership, or are (mis)used to justify their blatantly self-serving behavior. Even then, you tend to avoid the fruitless internecine squabbles that “enturbulate” other sites.
    You do not enflame and infuriate. You educate, and you ASK QUESTIONS of ALL sides. Those questions, which I have seen, have been straightforward and presented in a civil manner and gentle tone, inviting a meaningful discourse which the CoS has steadfastly refused. Even the M&M Freezoners ignore 99% of your queries and choose to misinterpret the rest, responding to them with that same old knee-jerk, LRH bull-baiting vitriol.
    Honestly, it amazes me. How you, Mark Bunker, Tory and a few others manage to maintain an even strain is beyond my understanding. However you do it, KEEP IT UP. I think that it’s WORKING! Thanks.
    (Oops. My spel chekkur doesn’t like “enturbulate”. How about “thetan”? Hah, another “fail”! “ Xenu”? Double Hah! “entheta”? Glory Be! I have a suppressive spell checker! Win! Yeeee Haw!)

  2. Robert Biasotti

    Whoa, Nellie!
    The link that is posted above : “A Question to Mike Rinder”, is a real “DO NOT MISS THIS!”
    If you are reading this comment, scroll up to the link and click! Now!
    Hello, why are you still here?

    [Ed. Note: Here’s the link: http://truthseekerblog.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/a-question-to-mike-rinder-2/]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s